Skip to main content

30 Wedding Photos: 16


So, number 16 and why this particular photo? I mean, not technically difficult and not startlingly original. But but but... well here's why: 1. The expressions - these are not a group of women who have been hanging about for 90 minutes waiting to have their photo taken; I asked, they said yes, I led them to some shade and a neutral-ish background, took about four shots in quick succession and boom, there you go - everyone looking happy and beautiful. 2. The colours - I like the colours. 3. The dresses - yep, colour me effeminate, but I like the different dresses. 4. It's a happy memory of a happy day.  5. Summer - what's not to like about a glorious summer's day? Even though we are in the shade here, there's no doubt that this is a lovely summer's day; probably if you are in the know, attuned, you can tell that these women are English and might guess that we are in England where such days are rare (no, I didn't ask them all their nationalities but there's something about their looks, their skin and the fashion). 6. The flare - I could have removed it in post but no, on balance, I like it - it mirrors the earring of the woman 2nd left and it adds, I think, rather than detracts - feel free to disagree.

As an aside, you can see I am not a purist when it comes to documenting weddings - yes, I prefer candid, unposed photographs in the main, but sometimes there are groups of people just crying out to have a picture taken together and this was, in my view, one such group.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Photography as Art

Having spent Friday night in prison in Oxford I wanted to recuperate a little yesterday and so took the time to visit the Ansel Adams exhibition at Oxford's modern art museum. Now, back when I were a nipper during my phirst phase of photographic interest, between the ages of about 18 and 25 (before the Exeter sojourn and the heavy-duty clubbing period thereafter), I remember I loved his work. However, since then, sadly, a more cynical Patrick held sway for a while (cynicism, for a long while, being my idea of sophistication) and I rather went off his pictures, or at least, the idea of his pictures. It seemed to me that everyone who had even the remotest interest in photography cited Adams as a key influence and criticism of him appeared off-limits. During this time I wasn't even sure that photography was an art, and that Adams couldn't be as good as I'd thought because he earned near universal praise for his work (I know, strange distorted thinking, but that's how …

Trump'ed on

You're probably sick of reading Niemöller's quote but here it is again - why not have another butcher's':

"First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out— 
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— 
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me."

(from The Holocaust Encyclopedia).

I've read it so many times throughout my life that when it appeared in my Facebook feed I'd roll my eyes and scroll past wondering why some unimaginative ass had bothered to post it yet again - didn't we all already know it off by bloody heart?

And now here I am, another unimaginative ass, posting it on the web and ensuring that both my readers are pissed off and bored. Only it does have a new urgency now doesn't it? I mean with The Orange One in power it becomes resonant again…

Waltercio Caldas

Portrait taken at Cecilia Brunson Project, Bermondsey.

From Wikipedia:

Waltércio Caldas Júnior (born 6 November 1946), also known as Waltércio Caldas, is a Brazilian sculptor, designer, and graphic artist. Caldas is best known as part of Brazil's Neo-Concretism movement as well as for his eclectic choices in materials.